Black history month has always been bitter-sweet in opinion. I'm glad to be apart of history simply because I am human and capable of so much, and black history too; simply because I get to marvel and enjoy the feats that my indirect predecessors have championed before I was even imagined in my mother's mind. But, what good is any history if you're not making your own? I vex at the fact that Dr. Carter G. Woodson's actions have been warped and consequentially condensed a group of people's history into 28 days that hardly is recognized in schools and major areas of education and socialization.
If you can think back to scholastic reads that your teacher would pass out, maybe you could also remember the particular issue featuring Dr King and (his)tory. I'm not sure if I possess the physical copy in my childhood archives, but the feel, illustration and detail is embedded and currently exists in my mind. For a long time (until) middle school, Dr King was the only face that I could practically name and think of for Black history month. That was especially attributed by the fact that my school curriculum only approached his name because our textbooks has a tiny excerpt about him redundantly. But the topic rendered to be taboo, therefore it was a territory not to be touched.
Most people find hostility in addressing Black History because of how secular it appears to be. But Black history is American history and Worldwide history and I cannot preach that enough. I state that not because I want to generalize the topic and beauty of my Black history; I want to make clear that just because our textbooks lack the plethora of raw and honest history that the foundation of this nation stands on, does not mean that it's an excuse not to investigate and further our curiosity about the people who make up this nation. There is no face nor homogeneous genetic that can identify this country and it's people. We range and that is truly what history is to me. A range. A valiance. And excuse my bias, but I find those who possess a difference in this world to be most stunning and interesting.
Each day, I gravitate farther from that moment when Dr. King was the only representation for Black history, but not for negative reasons. There is a reason why his legacy isso important and why he's the first name referenced. MLK solidifies history and why this nation and world is not monolithic, but (his)tory is not the only significant one. I rejoice at the fact that others like Angela Davis, Ntozake Shange, Celia Cruz, Latravia Nelson, Anne Lamott and women like my mother and mentors are people I can reference as a reflection of Black history. And they are in no way, shape nor form alike. They define and illustrate (her)story.
I see Black history in the Spanish, English, Dutch and French speaking nations of the Caribbean to the Aboriginals of Australia, Europe, Asia and beyond; none of the aforementioned could ever be condensed into 28 and sometimes 29 days; so why are we still trying to do that? My history has been going on for 17 healthy years and with the abundance that have taken place, I dare someone to try and condense me. No other race has been treated like this and it's time we go beyond the ceiling bestowed. If being black and celebrated for one month is all that is stipulated, than I don't want to be apart of that. I refuse.
This Black history year has been important to me because I don't have to dig deep into my library any longer. It's right there in the mirror and as long as I live and strive that is the only history that is important.
Happy Black history all year long.
-Sincerely, A.Neblett, author of Under Le Bleu Sun.